Furthermore, the bomb was not needed as said by the allied commander Eisenhower, as he said Japan was already largely defeated and the bomb was no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It pretty much worked, the war ended soon after and even though the Russian declared war on the Japan, like expected, they were not able to gain to much power in the Pacific.
In addition, the attack was unwarned, and it killed thousands of soldiers and civilians, crushing the spirits of United States citizens. Furthermore, the bomb was not Was the atomic bomb justified essay as said by the allied commander Eisenhower, as he said Japan was already largely defeated and the bomb was no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives.
Use of nuclear weapons as a retaliation to an unwarned attack is justified. People were in agony as well as him. The United States was justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima due to the unwarned attack on civilians and docked naval ships at Pearl Harbor by the Japanese.
The second on Nagasaki, however was obviously not. A full-scale invasion of Japan would have cost thousands upon thousands of American lives, and that was simply unacceptable!
The atomic bomb is a unique, powerful weapon, and should only be used in a dire situation. Another city was destroyed for no reason. The usage of atomic bomb in Japan might seem wrong today, but it was the best option during the war.
Condonement of nuclear weapons is foolish, but if used, they can be advantageous in the right situations. US killed innocents of people, they have committed a war crime and they have to be trialed for this.
The only way to prevent more deaths and injuries was to drop a bomb so powerful, the enemy would have no choice but to surrender. S wanted revenge for killing all those innocent people in one swipe, so they designed the Atomic bomb, a weapon that would cause mass destruction in a matter of seconds.
Until then, the fight had never been on United States soil. Japanese pilots took to the skies with mounted machine guns on bomber planes and thousands of pounds of explosives, and bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7th, Only the first bomb, dropped on Hiroshima, was justified to be dropped by the U. Furthermore, this unwarned attack was a cowardly act and dropping an atomic bomb was completely justified.
He wanted the unconditional and quick surrender of Japan, but even after the first bomb of destruction, he failed to gain this, leaving him no choice but to drop the second bomb.
The Americans played fair and gave Japan 5 days to surrender. Was it really necessary? WW2 had to stop and this made it happen. It was handled foolishly, in that the Japanese were not allowed enough time to surrender and it seemed like a big sick experiment.
According The Ordeal of Hiroshima; it states that: The Americans believed that they had not done much against the Japanese but cut trading to try and stop them from invading more of southern Asia. Us dropped two, then only with the intervention of the Emperor and even then, there was an attempted coup to prevent surrender.
Furthermore, the effects of the radiation from the bomb dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were indeed gruesome and horrible, but it was a retaliation to an equally barbaric bombing 3 years prior. This left Truman with two very difficult decisions; one: Furthermore, without the use of nuclear weapons, the war would have continued and more lives would have been lost.
They did not yet know the dangers of this powerful weapon and wanted to stage a demonstration for the Japanese to see what power the U. The effects of the bomb were radiation sickness, a powerful explosion on impact, ultimately killingtopeople from the combined city casualties. It was so show Japanese that is was a bad idea to start was on America, and it was a taste of their own medicine, to show them what would happen if they tried to attack again.
To avenge all those American lives lost, the United States launched the Manhattan project, developing the greatest weapon created at that time, the Atomic Bomb.
It saved more lives technically then would have been lost if the war had continued.Were the Americans justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August ? The dropping of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in by the Americans is a very controversial issue with no definite answer.
Was the United States justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Japan? On August 6,the United States became the first country to ever use the atomic bomb in warfare.
On this day, the first of the two atomic bombs were dropped. The first was known as "Little Boy" and was dropped on the city of.
The bomb crippled the Japanese and stopped them from attacking the states, thus effectively ending WWII in the Pacific Ocean. People also believed that President Harry Truman was justified in not one but both atomic bombs on Japan.
Ending the war was the main reason why President Truman launched the atomic bombs in the first place.
On August 6,the United States of America dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. For decades, there have been feuds relating to the justification of the bombing.
For decades, there have been feuds relating to the justification of the bombing.
The atomic bomb is a bomb that derives its destructive power from the rapid release of nuclear energy by fission of heavy atomic nuclei, causing damage through heat, blast, and radioactivity (kaleiseminari.com).
Use of the Atomic Bomb Against Japan was Justified Essay Words | 5 Pages. Use of the Atomic Bomb Against Japan was Justified The use of the atomic bomb against Japan was completely justified in both cause and impact.
An intense weapon was necessary to force a quick Japanese surrender.Download